Common operational pain
- Weekly reporting is still manual and fragile.
- CSV exports arrive messy with duplicates and broken fields.
- No alerting layer, so issues surface late.
Stackops One
I build fixed-scope automation for CSV cleanup, KPI digests, and monitoring alerts so your team can stop patching spreadsheets and focus on decisions.
Most teams do not need a full platform rebuild. They need targeted automation on the workflows that leak time every week.
Clear deliverables, clear timeline, clear ownership. No open-ended scope on first engagement.
Offer A
Offer B
Offer C
You can review anonymized output style before engagement. Replace these placeholders with your own demo clips and screenshots this week.
Low friction by design. You send the workflow, I return a scoped build and handoff materials.
A sample export, current workflow steps, and the outcome you need first. One realistic sample is enough to scope phase one.
Most fixed-scope builds start within 48-72 hours after scope confirmation. Larger work can be phased.
Initial delivery is workflow + assets + handoff docs. Ongoing hosting or scheduled runs can be added as a separate support scope.
Yes. Cleanup and validation are core offer areas, including duplicate handling, field normalization, and quality checks.
Privacy-first workflow, minimal required access, and explicit boundaries. Sensitive inputs can be anonymized for early scoping.
Change requests are handled as a clearly scoped phase two so timelines and cost remain predictable.
Yes. The preferred approach is one bounded deliverable that proves fit before any broader engagement.
No. The work is designed for operators and teams that need outcomes, not heavy implementation overhead.
If you send one sample export and one goal, I can usually respond with a clear scoped path quickly.
jesse@stackopsone.comUsually replies within 24h on business days.